Diakrisis Logismōn

Entries from October 2009

humility ?

October 29, 2009 · Leave a Comment

+++

Question What are the special characteristics of humility?

Answer Just as presumption dissipates the soul through imaginings that distract her and gives her free rein to fly among the clouds of her thoughts and to circle round all creation, so humility collects the soul through the stillness of the thoughts and concentrates her within herself. As the soul is unknown and invisible to corporeal eyes, so a humble man remains unknown amid men. As the soul abiding within the body is hidden from the sight and association with all men, so the truly humble man not only does not wish to be seen or known by men (for which reason he is secluded and distant from all men), but more, his will is – if possible – to plunge himself away from himself into himself. He wishes to enter and dwell in stillness, to forsake totally his former conceptions together with his senses, and to become as something that does not exist in creation, that has not come into being in this world, that is totally unknown even to his soul and his senses. And so long as such a man is hidden, locked away and withdrawn from the world, he remains wholly with his Lord.

A humble man is never pleased to see gatherings, confused crowds, tumult, shouts and cries, opulence, adornment, and luxury, the cause of insobriety; nor does he take pleasure in conversations, assemblies, noise, and the scattering of the senses; but above all he chooses to be by himself and to collect himself within himself, being alone in stillness, separated from all creation, and taking heed to himself in a silent place. Insignificance, absence of possessions, want and poverty are in every wise beloved by him. He is not engaged in manifold and fluctuating affairs, but at all times he desires to be unoccupied and free of the cares and the confusion of the things of this world, that he may keep his thoughts from going outside himself. For he is persuaded that if he becomes involved with many activities, it is not possible for him to remain without confused and disturbed thoughts. For many activities collect many cares and a swarm of diverse and complicated thoughts. These cause a man to leave the peacefulness of his thoughts (whereby he was superior to all earthly cares, except for the small necessities of life which are inevitable), and a state of mind that has a single concern amid peaceful reflections. And when necessities do not permit him to restrain his mouth from speaking, he is both harmed and causes harm. Then the door is thrown open to the passions, the tranquillity of discernment retires, humility flees, and the door to peace is shut. For all these reasons a humble man unceasingly protects himself from many affairs, and thus at all times he is found to be tranquil, gentle, peaceful, modest, and reverent.

St. Isaac the SyrianA humble man is never rash, hasty, or perturbed, never has any hot and volatile thoughts, but at all times remains calm. Even if heaven were to fall and cleave to the earth, the humble man would not be dismayed. Not every quiet man is humble, but every humble man is quiet. There is no humble man who is not self-constrained; but you will find many who are self-constrained without being humble. This is also what the meek and humble Lord meant when He said, ‘Learn of Me, for I am meek and humble of heart, and ye shall find rest unto your souls.’ For the humble man is always at rest, because there is nothing which can agitate or shake his mind. Just as no one can frighten a mountain, so the mind of a humble man cannot be frightened. If it be permissible and not incongruous, I should say that the humble man is not of this world. For he is not troubled and altered by sorrows, nor amazed and enthused by joys, but all his gladness and his real rejoicing are in the things of his Master. Humility is accompanied by modesty and self-collectedness: that is, chastity of the senses; a moderated voice; mean speech; self-belittlement; poor raiment; a gait that is not pompous; a gaze directed toward the earth; superabundant mercy; easily flowing tears; a solitary soul; a contrite heart; imperturbability to anger; undistracted senses; few possessions; moderation in every need; endurance; patience; fearlessness; manliness of heart born of a hatred for this temporal life; patient endurance of trials; deliberations that are ponderous, not light; extinction of thoughts; guarding of the mysteries of chastity; modesty; reverence; and above all, continually to be still and always to claim ignorance were any truly humble man who would venture to supplicate God when he draws nigh to prayer, or to ask to be accounted worthy of prayer, or to make entreaty for any other thing, or who would know what to pray. For the humble man keeps a reign of silence over all his deliberations, and simply awaits mercy and whatever decree should come forth concerning him from the countenance of God’s worshipful majesty. When he bows his face to the earth, and the divine vision within his heart is raised to the sublime gate leading to the Holy of Holies, wherein is He Whose dwelling-place is darkness which dims the eyes of the Seraphim and Whose brilliance awes the legions of their choirs and sheds silence upon all their orders [and when they are waiting for mysteries to shine forth from the Invisible One in that airless realm through a soundless motion, through bodiless senses, through image less perception of that formless Essence and of revelations which surpass them, the power of their thoughts being too weak to contain the waves of those mysteries]: then he dares only to speak and pray thus, ‘May it be unto me according to Thy will, O Lord.’ And may we also say the same for ourselves. Amen.

THE ASCETICAL HOMILIES OF ST. ISAAC THE SYRIAN   –  HOMILY SEVENTY-ONE

Categories: Hesychia · Humility · Isaac the Syrian

Origins of Halloween

October 29, 2009 · Leave a Comment

ON HALLOWEEN

(Excerpt from the old St. Nectarios Educational Series No. 81. Copy of full article available upon request.)

It is that time of the year when the secular society in which we live is preparing for the festival of Halloween. Though non-Orthodox Christians, our schools, our local community organizations and all forms of entertainment in television, radio and the press will share in and capitalize upon the festival of Halloween, it is impossible for Orthodox Christians to participate in this event at any level. The issue involved is simple faithfulness to God and the Holy Orthodox Christian faith. Halloween has its roots in paganism and continues to be a form of idolatry in which Satan, the angel of death, is worshipped. As we know, the very foundation of our Holy Church is built upon the blood of the martyrs who refused under the painful penalties of cruel torture and death to worship, venerate, or pay obeisance in any way to the idols who are Satan’s angels. Because of the faithfulness through obedience and self-sacrifice of the Holy Martyrs, God poured out upon His Holy Church abundant Grace and its numbers were increased daily, precisely at a time when one would have expected the threat of persecution to extinguish the flame of faith. But, contrary to the world’s understanding, humble faithfulness and obedience to God are the very life lines of our life in Christ through Whom we are given true spiritual peace, love and joy, and participation in the miraculous workings of His Holy Spirit. There- fore the Holy Church calls us to faithfulness by our turning away from falsehood toward Truth and eternal life.

With regard to our non-participation in the pagan festival of Halloween, we will be strengthened by an understanding of the spiritual roots and history of this anti-Christian feast. The feast of Halloween began in pre-Christian times among the Celtic peoples of Great Britain, Ireland and northern France. These pagan peoples believed that life was born from death. Therefore, they celebrated the beginning of the “new year” in the fall (on the eve of October 31 and into the day of November 1) when, as they believed, the season of cold, darkness, decay and death began. A certain deity whom they called Samhain was believed by the Celts to be the Lord of Death and it was he whom they honored at their New Year’s festival.

There were, from an Orthodox Christian point of view, many diabolical beliefs and practices associated with this feast which, it will be clear, have endured to this time. On the eve of the New Year’s festival, the Druids who were the priests of the Celtic cult, instructed their people to extinguish all hearth fires and lights. On the evening of the festival a huge bonfire built from oak branches, which they believed to be sacred, was ignited. Upon this fire sacrifices of crops, animals and even human beings were burned as an offering in order to appease and cajole Samhain, the Lord of Death. It was also believed that Samhain, being pleased by their faithful offerings, allowed the souls of the dead to return to their homes for a festal visit on this day. It is from this belief that the practice of wandering about in the dark dressed up in costumes imitating ghosts, witches, hobgoblins, fairies and demons grew up. For the living entered into fellowship and communion with the dead by what was, and still is, a ritual act of imitation, through costume and the activity of wandering around in the dark of night, even as the souls of the dead were believed to wander.

The dialogue of trick or treat is also an integral part of this system of beliefs and practices. It was believed that the souls of the dead who had entered into the world of darkness, decay and death, and therefore into total communion with and submission to Samhain the Lord of Death, bore the affliction of great hunger on their festal visit. Out of this grew the practice of begging which was a further ritual enactment and imitation of what the Celts believed to be the activities of the souls of the dead on their festal visit. Associated with this is the still further implication that if the souls of the dead and their imitators were not appeased with “treats”, i.e. offerings, then the wrath and anger of Samhain, whose angels and servants the souls-and their imitators had become, would be un- leashed through a system of “tricks,” or, as an Orthodox Christian would under- stand it, curses.

Obviously then, from an Orthodox Christian point of view, participation in these practices at any level is impossible and idolatrous, a genuine betrayal of our God and our Holy Faith. For if we participate in the ritual activity of imitating the dead by dressing up in their attire or by wandering about in the dark, or by begging with them, then we have willfully sought fellowship with the dead, whose Lord is not Samhain as the Celts believed but Satan, the Evil One who stands against God. Further, if we submit to the dialogue of “trick or treat,” we make our offering not to innocent little children, but rather to Samhain, the Lord of Death whom they have come to serve as imitators of the dead, wandering in the dark of night.

Evil spirits do exist. The devil exists. Christ came into the world “so that, through death, He might destroy him that had the dominion of death, that is, the Devil” (Hebrews 2:14). It is imperative for us to realize as Christians that our greatest foes are not our political enemies, but the Evil One who inspires nations and individuals to sin against mankind, and who prevents them from coming to a knowledge of the truth. Unless we realize that Satan is our real enemy, we can never hope for spiritual progress within our lives. “For our struggle is not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the world rulers of the darkness of this age, against the spiritual hosts of wickedness in the heavenly places” (Ephesians 6:12).

st-michael-of-the-apocalypse

Categories: Death · Demonic Energy · Demons · Halloween · Samhain

bitter regret

October 27, 2009 · Leave a Comment

St. Isaac the SyrianI also maintain that those who are punished in Gehenna are scourged by the scourge of love. Nay, what is so bitter and vehement as the torment of love? I mean that those who have become conscious that they have sinned against love suffer greater torment from this than from any fear of punishment. For the sorrow caused in the heart by sin against love is more poignant than any torment. It would be improper for a man to think that sinners in Gehenna are deprived of the love of God. Love is the offspring of knowledge of the truth which, as is commonly confessed, is given to all. The power of love works in two ways: it torments sinners, even as happens here when a friend suffers from a friend; but it becomes a source of joy for those who have observed its duties. Thus I say that this is the torment of Gehenna: bitter regret. But love inebriates the souls of the sons of Heaven by its delectability.

– St. Isaak the Syrian Homily Twenty-Eight

 

Categories: Eternal Torment · Gehenna · Isaac the Syrian

seated in the midst of the heart

October 25, 2009 · Leave a Comment

Introduction to the Philokalic Writings of the Blessed Hesychios

From Elder Basil of Poiana Marului: Spiritual Father of St. Paisy Velichkovsky

In a certain sense, the life and teachings of the holy fathers is like the way men provide for all their bodily needs and necessities. A person who has mastered some craft or skill uses it to support himself. Another person puts his efforts into the various chores of farming and procures all the necessities for his household this way. Still others, who are more enterprising, instead of such crafts and occupations as these, acquire, say, a ship or a vineyard and thus satisfy their needs free from all the anxiety and instability and vicissitudes of working for a living.

This pattern can also be observed in the spiritual life. Some of the holy fathers, in view of the weakness of those who have just entered into monasticism, assign them, along with fulfilling the commandments of Christ, prolonged reading of the psalms, canons and troparia which have been instituted by the Holy Spirit for the glorification of God and as a rule for monastics. But there are others who have learned the refined skill of spiritual understanding and who do not want beginners to be occupied only with physical training. Together with the commandments of Christ, they give them a moderate rule of psalmody, that is nocturns, matins, the hours, vespers and compline, and in place of lengthy psalmody they lay down the rule of practicing noetic prayer, with this additional condition: should the Holy Spirit visit a person through the activity of prayer of the heart, then he should by all means leave off the above said external rule, because internal prayer fulfills it. Such instructors impart noetic work in part, but not to a very great extent, says St. Gregory of Sinai. There is a third group who from great skill and examination of the lives and writings of all the saints, and especially through the action and wisdom of the Holy and Life-giving Spirit, lay down the learning and practice of noetic prayer as a general rule, especially for beginners; for this, they say, is the mortification of the passions by fulfilling the commandments of Christ. They divide it into two principalities, like a second Paradise which gushes forth an ocean divided into two streams, that is active and spiritual prayer.

Consequently they direct that all of one’s effort be devoted to noetic work and permit only a little chanting in times of despondency. For they say the appointed hours and hymns of the Church are a tradition for all Christians in general, but not for those who wish to live in stillness. Furthermore, through the instructions of the first mentioned holy fathers, a person may come to fruition, but very slowly and with much pain. For the second it is easier and lighter. For the third it is quickest of all, with the joy and frequent visitation of the Holy Spirit strengthening and enlightening the heart. This is especially true when there is very fervent zeal and good intention rather than the fear of the law. For then a person actively strives only for sweetness of heart and spiritual consolation in prayer and for no other reason, and internal prayer by itself replaces all external activities or what is called a rule, be it psalmody or intercession or study, because it encompasses all of these. For the remembrance of death, or better to say the sense of judgement and eternal torment and rejection by God are interwoven with it as if they were of the same plant. Subsequently, by this means alone as if from a ship or vineyard, as we mentioned above, a person can spend his entire life in stillness.

How does this sacred prayer blend with the commandments of the Lord and drive out the demons and passions? And again, how is it that, just like the person who is careless about the commandments, the one who takes no care for noetic work, who is diligent only in psalmody, is dragged about by the passions and falls into eternal exhaustion?

Violating the Lord’s commandments appears the same, no matter who does it; however, it actually works in different ways, as I will explain. Someone makes a beginning of not violating the commandments and not arousing the passions but, because of some circumstances or disturbance or warfare, he happens to offend someone or he himself takes offense or he judges someone or gets angry or is overcome by vainglory or argues and justifies himself or speaks idly or lies or overeats or drinks to excess, has impure thoughts, arouses the passions, and so on, clearly in violation of the commandments and a fall for the soul. After he has offended God by such things he immediately begins to rebuke himself and with repentance to fall before God with heartfelt noetic prayer that He forgive him and help him not to fall into the same sins again. And thus he makes a beginning of keeping the commandments and guarding his heart from evil suggestions through prayer, in fear and trembling that he not fall away from the kingdom of heaven because of such things. Another person has no resolve to keep the commandments and so simply is not concerned whether he falls or stands, thinking that in our times no one keeps the commandments or is concerned about violating them, that everyone, willingly or not, is an offender before God and is guilty of subtle sins and passions. Thus, because it seems impossible, he does not want to be attentive to such things and only concerns himself with avoiding adultery, fornication, homosexuality, bestiality, murder, poisoning and such mortal and major sins as these. As long as he keeps himself from these things, he thinks he is standing.

To such a person the fathers said: Better one who falls and gets up than one who stands and does not repent. Here we must marvel at how both these persons, who are falling into the same sins every hour, are not the same before God, I think, nor before spiritual men. For one of these is extremely ignorant of his falls and of picking himself back up, even though the passions are at work, as will be explained below. But the other falls and gets up, is conquered and conquers. Another struggles and labors and afterwards is overcome by the pressure of the passions. Another does not want to speak a word in anger, but is caught up by habit. Another struggles not to speak any evil but grieves that he has been insulted, yet he rebukes himself for grieving and repents of this. Another does not grieve that he was insulted but neither does he rejoice. Now all of these are opposing the passions, for by their intention they have stopped the passion, and do not want it to act. So they grieve and struggle. As the fathers say: Everything that the soul does not want is short-lived.

I want to speak about those who are uprooting a passion. There are some who rejoice when they are insulted because they expect a reward. Such persons are uprooting the passion but not intelligently. Another person rejoices when he is insulted and thinks that he should have been insulted, because he gave the occasion for it. Such a person is uprooting the passion intelligently. There is another who not only rejoices when he is insulted and considers himself guilty, but who even grieves for the distress he caused for the person who insulted him. May God bring us to such a state!

Let me tell you a parable describing a person who accepts a passion and acts accordingly. He is like a man under enemy fire who takes the arrows into his own hands and plunges them into his heart. The person who opposes the passions, however, is like one who is under enemy fire but who is armored in a breastplate and receives no wound. But he that uproots the passions is like a man under fire who grabs the arrows and either breaks them or fires them back at the enemy. May God grant us strength if not to uproot the passions, then at least not to act according to them and to oppose them!

We should understand that St. Dorotheos, explaining this kind of opposition to and strangling of the passions, demonstrates how this comes about only through the commandments. Now we just said that anyone opposing the passions is like a person under enemy fire armored in a breastplate who suffers no wound. Therefore, since he is not wounded, what reason could there be to shun noetic work? Moreover, if this sacred activity be yoked with the commandments, his progress will be twice that of just keeping the commandments alone.

In order to understand more clearly these two ways of life, we will speak of each one, calling each by its own name. Now the first, who submits himself to the law, performs only his psalmody. The other, forcing himself to noetic work, always has the name of Jesus Christ with him to destroy the enemy and the passions with their evil thoughts. The one rejoices if he just completes his psalmody. But the other gives thanks to God if he practices the prayer in quiet free from evil thoughts. The one is concerned with quantity, but the other with quality. The one rushes to complete his set amount of psalmody. He soon also develops a sense of self-satisfaction, since he relies on psalmody and does not know how to call on the Lord Jesus Christ. Thus, if he is not attentive to himself, he nourishes and cultivates the internal pharisee. But the other, who is diligent for the quality of prayer, comes to an awareness of his weakness and God’s help. For when he prays, or better to say, when he calls on the Lord Jesus against the suggestions of the enemy, against the passions and evil thoughts, he sees how they perish before the terrible name of Christ, and he understands God’s strength and help. And again, when he is attacked and depressed by evil thoughts he realizes his own weakness, that he cannot stand against them on his own. And this is his entire rule and discipline. Even if the enemy is able to lure him with self-satisfaction and pharisaism, still the same enemy finds him prepared to call on Christ against such a suggestion, just as against all other evil thoughts, and so has no success against him.

But someone might say that it is possible for the other person also to call on Christ against such a suggestion. Yes, it is possible. However, by experience we all know that it is not the custom nowadays for any of those who labor to fulfill an external rule to learn how to pray against evil thoughts. It is these persons in particular who refuse to accept either the spoken or written word concerning internal attention, wherein lies the art of praying against evil thoughts.

Not only do they refuse to accept, they even raise up opposition and, setting themselves up as teachers, say that this noetic work is not for beginners, according to the tradition of the holy fathers, but only psalms, troparia and canons performed by the mouth and the tongue. And even though they speak and teach wrongly, everyone listens to them. For such a form of prayer there is no need to become aware of or to deny worldly desires. Anyone, be he a monk or a layman, if only he wants to, can pray this way. But sacred noetic work, this glorious and God-pleasing art that surpasses all arts, is found by no one unless he deny the world with its desires and employ much instruction and study. This is why this activity has virtually disappeared among monastics. Relentless warfare comes on those who are ignorant of the power of the holy Scriptures and in particular of the art of mental attentiveness over the inner man. In the midst of all this, one must beware of wandering off to the right or to the left, that is, into despair or audacity.

When we see what is written here, that is, how those who are learning noetic work by happenstance and not by intention, suffer incidental and involuntary falls, which the fathers call daily sins, let us have no doubt about this: Both the progress and the fall from good to its opposite correspond to the measure of each person, be he a beginner or in the middle or near perfection, the fathers say.

Then again, when we hear of the great loving-kindness of God to us sinners, we must not be overly bold or take recourse to this sacred noetic liturgy fearlessly, without great humility and the fulfillment of the commandments to the utmost of our ability. Let us rather understand that audacity and despair are from the enemy and mightily flee both of them. Thus, learn this activity with extensive searching of the holy Scriptures and the counsel of those skilled in humility.

It also appears necessary to underscore the following as well. Here are great weapons against the enemy and evil desires: memory of death or of gehenna and of eternal torments or the last judgement, the trials of the soul after death, or of the heavenly kingdom and the joy of the saints and other such matters. However for us, passionate and insensitive as we are, all this is very weak without mental attentiveness and calling on the name of Jesus Christ. If a person who has overcome insensitivity can quench the lusts of the flesh and vanquish evil thoughts from his soul by the remembrance of such things, still the terrible name of Jesus Christ has greater power beyond all compare to cleanse the heart and mind completely. Therefore, when noetic work is yoked with the memory of such things we work with redoubled strength, imparting no little reinforcement to the prayer itself. Moreover, even we ourselves shine like light from the prayer when the darkness and fog of the passions is driven from our mind by the name of Jesus Christ.

In order to complete everything we have written here, we present the words of St. Anastasios of Sinai who said:

We have the following understanding and opinion concerning those who receive the holy Mysteries of the Body and Blood of the Lord, that if persons have some small human sins that are readily forgiven, such as: being robbed [committing a sin] by the tongue or hearing or eyes or by vainglory or by sorrow or anger or such things as these, that once they rebuke themselves and make confession to God let them thus receive the holy Mysteries. We believe that the reception of the holy Mysteries for such persons is unto the cleansing of sins.

Here we find the same basic concept and criterion that we applied above in discussing the falls suffered by those who are learning the practice of noetic prayer.

Now insofar as the fathers say that the key to understanding the Scriptures is noetic and sacred prayer, it becomes clear that those who do not want to learn it are completely unable to comprehend the power of the writings of the Scriptures and the fathers. For this reason, some who argue against speaking about noetic prayer, be it only a little or at great length, point to the writings of the fathers which say a person must first put the physical senses in order, that is sight, smell, taste, speaking and touch, so that he not sin through them. Then once this is all put in good order, he undertakes noetic prayer. To these persons we reply: No one, my dear friends, is arguing against putting the physical senses in proper order, but to separate the ordering of the senses from noetic work is to introduce a great disharmony.

To begin with, St. Hesychios speaks thus:

Fear God and keep His commandments both in your feelings and in your intellect. If you force yourself to keep them in your intellect, bit by bit you will attain to fulfilling them in your feelings.

And again:

If a man does not do the will of God and keep His law within himself [literally: in the midst of his belly], that is in the midst of his heart, neither will he be able to fulfill it externally.

St. Symeon the New Theologian also says:

Since the holy fathers knew that through internal activity it is easy to put all the external virtues in order, they left off external activity and devoted all their effort to internal watchfulness, and so on.

As for you then, my friends who wish to separate the time for guarding the physical senses from that for learning noetic prayer, you show by this that you are ignorant of the order and action of the heart. Anyone who knows the art of noetic prayer does not separate the time for learning each of these, but he makes it his rule to learn them in equal measure together as one. By immersing his intellect within his heart at the time of prayer, he quenches the seething of the senses by not allowing the intellect to chase after them. When the intellect does not chase after the physical senses, the senses remain idle outside and thereby impart great stillness to the mind and heart. In this way, through the guarding of the mind men gradually train themselves not to follow the desires of the flesh.

You should also know that there is no lack of time or subjects or occasions for those who are given over to arguing about such matters, but for these persons there also remains what was written by the New Theologian, “He that is learning noetic work must first of all guard his conscience before God and men and things.” But I believe that in a single hour or minute a man can reconcile his conscience with God and men and things, according to the great teacher. The sting, that is pangs of conscience, does not quench noetic work nor is anyone benefited by turning away from this good accuser. For I behold that great sinner entering the holy temple surrounded by demons but leaving it with the holy angels rejoicing over his conversion. And yet you, because of your advanced neglect of your conscience, would institute an appointed place and time for reconciling it with God. This is what you demonstrate by teaching that the acquisition of passionlessness precedes the learning of noetic work or, in other words, that noetic work is more advanced than passionlessness. So you have come to the point that not only do you never undertake mental sobriety yourselves, but you even abstain from communing the holy Mysteries also. For no such person receives Communion without reconciling his conscience with God. All that I am telling you, O man, is not my own personal idea about reconciliation of conscience; I am setting forth the confession of the holy fathers themselves. As for them, the closer they come to God, the more they behold themselves to be sinners. Following your logic, then, are we to conclude that the saints themselves did not reconcile their conscience with God?

But you retort, the saints said this about themselves out of humility. Stop tangling up my words and submit to the sense of what the saints are saying. If anyone says that out of humility, merely pretending to be sinners, the saints spoke these words, “Forgive us our debts”—let him be anathema.

Furthermore, if anyone wants to arrive at a proper understanding of these things, let him believe that God first made a body for Adam and likewise the soul; there was no distinction in time, but they were both created together with an intelligent purpose, even though Origen held a different opinion about this.

Likewise then, the guarding of our physical senses and the reconciliation of our conscience with God are accomplished together in an intelligent manner through mental attentiveness, even though it may seem to be otherwise to those who are ignorant of the power and art of internal activity.

Now do not marvel, my pious reader, that this introduction is composed of such polemical argumentation. When a brisk wind blows the sails are filled. In the times of the holy fathers when many were zealous for this noetic work and sought to acquire it through self-will and audacity, it was appropriate for the fathers to make an effort to restrain the audacity and disorderliness of such persons, so that they not dive into such things fearlessly. But now such instructions have been so badly forgotten and are in such disregard that many are beginning to wage war against and to slander this internal path both on the right and on the left, from above and from below, striving to bury it in the dust so that it be completely unknown to anyone. So it has become necessary to write about it in this way and to confront these issues in introducing the little book of Hesychios of Jerusalem, which contains nothing else than understanding and instruction on the path of sacred noetic work alone.

Whoever wants to be instructed in this first let him understand and do what St. Maximos said, “Provide for the body according to its strength and devote all your struggle to the mind.” And again, “Physical virtues are pleasing [to God] if they are done with humility; without this our labor is in vain.” And likewise, “Do not devote all of your effort to the flesh, but set it a limit of abstinence corresponding to its strength and turn your whole mind towards internal matters; for bodily training is of little benefit.”

St. Hesychios says of this:

He that does not know how to travel the spiritual path does not take concern or correct his passionate thoughts, but devotes all of his exercise and care to the flesh. Such a person is either a glutton and dissipated, or gets depressed, loses his temper, holds grudges and thus darkens his mind, or through excessive abstinence he misses the mark and disturbs his mind.

Again, St. Diadochos says:

The same way as the body, being weighed down by abundance of food, makes the mind somehow cowardly and ill-tempered, so also it can weaken the mind through excessive abstinence and bring it to a state that is somewhat feeble and disinclined to behold worthy ideas. In opposition to bodily movements, one should make proper use of food, so that when the body is healthy it be wearied as much as is needful. But when it is ailing, let it be strengthened moderately. For the ascetic should not exhaust his body but provide for it so as to be able to practice his asceticism.

Yet again, St. John Climacus says, “I have seen this enemy put at ease and imparting vigilance to the mind” and so on. For we ought to have a body that is healthy but not uncontrolled, because noetic work requires physical strength. Therefore one must mightily flee from both excessive fasting and from laxity.

We recommend the rule laid down by St. Gregory of Sinai, who said of this:

For those who are still forcing themselves, a pound of bread is sufficient, and three or four cups of water or wine, according to the day, is enough for one who wants to find God. As for the sweets that may be at hand, take a little of each but not to satiety, so as to escape conceit and not disdain the good creations of God, giving thanks to Him for everything. Such is the reasoning of the wise. For those who are weak in the faith, abstinence in food is very beneficial, for it is them that the apostle commands to eat greens [Romans 14:2], because they do not believe that they are protected by God.

There are three degrees of eating: abstinence, adequacy and satiety. Abstinence is when one is hungry after eating. Adequacy is when one is neither hungry nor weighed down. Satiety is when one is weighed down a little. To eat beyond satiety is the door to gluttony through which lust enters in. And so, examine all this and chose what is suited for your strength, without violating the rules. It is for the perfect, and this is according to the apostle, to go hungry and to be filled and in all things to be strong [Philippians 4:12-13].

Finally we must also recall that those who know the art of noetic work realize that psalmody is not suited (it is proper for beginners and the passionate) for constantly praying for one’s sins or against evil thoughts and the passions, because of the multitude of words employed, some to glorify God, others beholding His creatures or God’s dispensation and providence or His threats and promises or that He is pre-eternal and incomprehensible, and such things as these which the passionate and ailing mind cannot behold. In psalmody one’s thoughts fall into fantasy and only passively observe. A person thus only keeps to an external quantity and when he gets used to keeping it, he falls into a kind of complacent self-satisfaction and boasting of the heart of which St. John Climacus, who was experienced in such things, has said:

Do not begin with being overly wordy, lest the mind be distracted by searching for words. A single word of the publican evoked the mercy of God and a single utterance saved the thief. A multitude of words has frequently distracted the mind and robbed it, while a few words gather it together well.

What the New Theologian wrote is correct. After the withering of the passions chanting comes naturally for the tongue. For how can one sing or chant the hymn of the Lord in a foreign land [Psalm 136:4]—that is, in a passionate heart?

Furthermore, if a person does not want to learn noetic work, he cannot learn this beginning phase in the first place, that is what suggestion is, and acceptance, captivity and passion. He that is ignorant of these things is ignorant of his own falling and rising. By not learning the art of such things he is deprived of hourly repentance. Because he does not have constant repentance, he is ignorant of his weakness. Being deprived of this realization, he is alien to contrition of heart and confession to God. Without these things he does not come to the fear of God. Because he does not have fear, he does not know how to pray constantly for his sins, but he is like a tenant farmer toiling only for the quantity of his psalmody.

Such an order of noetic work is described by St. Cassian, who says:

Concerning those lesser sins through which the righteous fall and rise up seven times a day [Proverbs 24:16], let us never remain without lamentation and repentance, for either by ignorance or forgetfulness or unintentionally or by necessity or out of physical weakness every day we sin voluntarily and involuntarily; as the apostle says, “I do what I do not want” and again, “O wretched man am I! Who will deliver me from the body of this death?” [Romans 7:15,24].

Now since everyone who is learning noetic work prays, or better to say practices the Jesus Prayer, for his sins or prays against evil thoughts as has been said, let him not practice much psalmody. For those who chant extensively do not understand what they chant, says the New Theologian, since prolonged chanting has been instituted for those who do not understand what they are chanting.

Likewise St. Isaac says:

Do you want to nourish yourself with psalmody during your liturgy? Then completely disregard quantity and set no rules concerning the amount.

And St. Gregory of Sinai says:

Some teach to chant much and some little. Do not chant too much, but rather imitate those who chant little. Much chanting is for those of the active life and not for those who live in stillness. For our chanting should correspond to our way of life and be angelic and not carnal, lest I say pagan.

To chant with the voice out loud was given because of our indolence and ignorance. None of the saints made a great effort to speak or write at length only about psalmody. Indeed, what need is there to write much about what everyone knows, not only monastics but lay folks as well? Laymen can also chant as much as they want, as has already been said. But as for this brief prayer which consists of five words, as the apostle says [1 Corinthians 14:19]: 1. Lord; 2. Jesus; 3. Christ; 4. have mercy; 5. on me—about this alone St. Hesychios wrote two hundred chapters in which he gives instructions only about mental attentiveness and this sacred prayer of Jesus. Likewise our fathers among the saints John Chrysostom, Ignatios, Photios and Kallistos, all of whom succeeded to the patriarchal throne of Constantinople, each individually wrote entire books with exceptional wisdom only about this brief prayer and attentiveness, as St. Symeon Archbishop of Thessalonica has said. Also in his own holy book he composed six entire chapters commanding both clergy and laymen to practice this sacred prayer with their mind and lips like their own breathing. Likewise St. Neilos the Ascetic, St. John Climacus, Philotheos of Sinai, Maximos the Confessor, Symeon the New Theologian, Niketas Stethatos, Diadochos, Peter of Damascus, Gregory of Sinai, Barsanuphios, Philemon, Isaac of Syria and after all of these, Nil Sorsky—all of these, and a great multitude of others, composed many chapters concerning sacred noetic work. They beheld how these deeps are not easily mastered, so they strove, one after the other, to show us as clearly as possible how to traverse them. In contrast to external psalmody, which we have already discussed, this is not easily attained by anyone, not only lay folk but even monks themselves. When a ship stands at the shore, anyone can load or unload it with no hindrance or difficulty except the labor itself. But when it sails out to sea with a heavy cargo, then it is only the skillful helmsman who can govern it. Understand this with respect to the difference between external psalmody and noetic prayer.

Holy fathers and brethren, we must submit to the teachings of these holy fathers who teach about sacred noetic work and not just keep trudging around the same circle of lengthy psalmody like a donkey turning a millstone, because we are unwilling to travel the strait and direct path of venerable noetic stillness and prayer. The care of the saints for this sacred activity was so great that they command us to pray for those who do not know this noetic light of the heart which is enlightened by the name of Christ our God.

Moreover let no one be in doubt when he leaves off prolonged psalmody, as if he is being deprived of a monastic rule. For just as those who believe in Christ have fulfilled all the law even if they have abandoned it, so also those who exchange prolonged psalmody for sacred noetic work fulfill the entire rule. Just as the law conducted all to Christ and longed for this, so also psalmody, after teaching us in advance, gives way to attentiveness of heart and prayer. And if psalmody itself decreases, this is what it was intended for. If some of those who are ignorant of the art of sacred noetic work and who do not want to learn it contrive many reasons and want to voice or express opinions that are to the contrary to what we write here, then let them read the holy books mentioned above, which were set down by the holy patriarchs, by the venerable fathers, and in particular this little book of St. Hesychios. As I believe in God, they will either find rest for their soul, or, because they are incurably ill, they will turn their blasphemy against the holy fathers who have written this way, or better to say against the Holy Spirit Who spoke in them. Such blasphemy will not be forgiven them either in this age or in the future, according to the word of the Lord [Matthew 12:31]. Amen.

Having thus given an answer, as far as I was able, to those afflicted with doubts and who are making opposition with objections from the right and from the left, we need to take up what we did not finish, taking the word from the Gospel which says, “Master, did we not sow good seed? Then where did the tares come from?” [Matthew 13:27]. It is not possible for evil not to steal in among the good and so delusion is mixed in with this sacred noetic work, like the proverbial scavenge vines on a tree. It takes its origins from conceit and self-will. These are healed by humility, searching the Scriptures and spiritual counsel, but not by turning away from learning noetic work. For St. Gregory of Sinai says that we must not fear or doubt when we call on God; and if some have gone astray, suffering mental harm, then be certain that they suffered all this because of self-will and conceit. The cause of this conceit is unreasonable and excessive fasting when the faster thinks that he is fulfilling a virtue, and not fasting for the sake of self-restraint, says St. Dorotheos, and also because of living alone. This same saint says when he explains the former cause, that for this reason the person living in stillness must always keep to the royal path for he knows that conceit quickly or easily follows excess in anything, and it is followed by delusion. Cutting down the second, he says “It is for the powerful and the perfect to enter into single combat with the demons and to wield against them the sword which is the word of God.”

The manner and method of delusion is the enemy’s communicating with the desires of the inner entrails, in the former instance, but in the second through hallucinations and mental fantasy. Concerning the former, he gives warning by saying:

The enemy disguises himself within the natural entrails in some spiritual guise, because he wants to bring on his own burning in place of spiritual warmth, introducing his own burning with profane delight and the sweetness of the humors in place of joy and impels a person to consider his delusion to be active grace at work. Nevertheless, time and experience and sensitivity will bring him to light.

Concerning the second, he gives this instruction, warning of the danger:

And if you are living in stillness by no means accept anything that you see through the senses or the mind either externally or internally, be it the image of Christ or of the angels or the appearance of a saint or light or fire, etc.

For it is here that the snarer once again comes to life and he will attack to make noetic work the cause of delusion.

Some think that there is no delusion mixed in with external psalmody. But be sure of this, that delusion can be equally mixed in with either psalmody or prayer, due to the lack of skill on the part of those who are practicing it. St. John Climacus says:

Let us examine and see and take measure how much the sweetness of the lustful demons comes to us in chanting and how much of the grace and power that is in you is from spiritual words.

And again:

When chanting and praying, be on guard for the pleasure that may arise, lest it be intermingled with bitter poisons.

And so, you see, does this not apply equally to the delusion of those who are chanting as well as to those who are practicing prayers? But because those who are ignorant of noetic work are concerned only about completing their rule of psalmody they have no concept of evil thoughts and the seething of desires. Therefore they do not realize when the appetitive faculty is seething on its own and when it is filled with passionate delight, through communing with the enemy.

Nor do they know how to escape such things. As it is written, “They hear the battle and they suffer wounds, but who the enemies are and why they are making war they do not know,” even though these sinful ones be working lawlessness on their own back or before their very eyes.

Thus having learned that it is not noetic work which is the cause of delusion, but only our own self-will and conceit, we should not flee from noetic work. For it is not this which brings delusion upon us, but rather it opens our noetic eyes to understand and recognize delusions, which will never be recognized by a person who has not been instructed in this sacred noetic work, even if he be a very great faster and anchorite.

It is good for those who are practicing noetic work to know this also. When warmth begins to seethe on its own from the belly, without carnal thoughts and comes to the heart, do not be terrified by this or lose courage, but simply turn away from it with your will and mind as being something useless, and send it back. However, if someone accepts this or thinks that it is grace, he is deceived.

For beginners, the true action of prayer free from delusion is to begin noetic prayer in the heart and to finish it in the heart, so that the intellect is covered in the depth of the heart, but not in the appetitive faculty, says the all-holy Patriarch Kallistos. Above all, understand from the beginning that a person’s attention at the time of prayer must be focused not in the middle of the heart nor below it, but above so that the intellect guards the midst of the heart. Here is the reason for this. By experience it has been learned that if the intellect practices the prayer in the middle of the breast, simply looking to the middle of the heart, then willingly or unwillingly, lustful heat at times will affect it, because it lies near the belly. When a person encounters this, he turns from it, but he will have to endure much toil and distress because of his unskillful attention. If a person dares to concentrate his attention at the bottom of the heart, his intellect lying entirely in the belly and looking from there into the depths of the heart and practicing the prayer, he will commit adultery in his heart by wilfully kindling his members with passionate lust, because he is providing a place for the enemy within himself. This is obvious delusion which nowadays many persons encounter and suffer from because of their ignorance. After such suffering they jump back from learning noetic work, saying this is only for passionless men. And thus they become a stumbling block for themselves and for all who want to undertake mental attentiveness. For them it would be better to have a stone hung around their neck and be drowned than to scandalize themselves and many others [Matthew 18:6].

Moreover, they do not confess their ignorance and self-willed audacity but proclaim themselves teachers and say that all who want to learn mental attentiveness will suffer likewise. May this not be so!

Therefore, everyone must overshadow his heart from above with the intellect and constantly gazing into its depth practice the prayer. For, according to the writings, when the mind is seated here in the midst of the heart and not to one side in the breast, like a king on a lofty throne it is able to avoid the belly completely and repel the heat of desires in particular. As it beholds from that height all that is swirling around before its eyes below, it can turn away from some, cast out others, and yet others, which are the infants of Babylon, it can smash on the rock which is Christ [Psalm 136:9].

From Elder Basil of Poiana Marului: Spiritual Father of St. Paisy Velichkovsky, by a Monk of Prophet Elias Skete (Liberty, TN: Saint John of Kronstadt Press, 1997), pp. 69-85. Blessed Hesychios’ writings have been translated into English and appear in The Philokalia. See especially On Watchfulness and Holiness in volume I of The Philokalia, pp. 162-179. This introduction has been published on the internet with the kind permission of the anonymous author and Father Gregory Williams. For the textual apparatus see the book.

Categories: Elder Basil of Poiana Marului · St. Paisius (Velichkovsky)

name denoting

October 24, 2009 · Leave a Comment

‘Satan’ is a name denoting the deviation of the human will from Truth; it is not the designation of natural being.

– St. Isaac the Syrian

_

Categories: Isaac the Syrian · Satan · discernment

pearl in every oyster ?

October 23, 2009 · Leave a Comment

If a diver found a pearl

in every oyster,

then everyone would

quickly become rich.

- St. Abba Isaak the Syrian

Categories: Asceticism · Isaac the Syrian

Visitation of the Apostle Paul

October 18, 2009 · Leave a Comment

The Saint is Visited by Saint Paul

St. Chrysostomos



As we have mentioned, the saint was very skilled in preaching and giving the correct meaning of the spirit of the sacred, Scriptures. He especially excelled in explaining the Epistles of the Apostle Paul, to whom he was particularly devoted. He willingly and readily gave explanations for the Epistles, so much so that he was always mentioning the words of Saint Paul, as though the apostle were living and breathing in him. For this reason Saint John implored God to reveal His mysteries, and to confirm if his explanations of the Epistles were pleasing to the Apostle Paul. Hearken to how God dispensed His answer.

The emperor was moved to wrath once against a certain palace official. The emperor confiscated the man’s property and ordered his execution. The official, having no other place of refuge, made haste to the saint. However, at the hour that he arrived at the patriarchal residence, he was unable to find the bishop free. The bishop, however, was notified of the official’s arrival and related to him that he expected to be free about the hour of Apodeipno (Compline). Afterward Saint John informed Proklos, his disciple (and the future bishop), that upon the official’s arrival he was to bring him quietly to his cell. Night had fallen, and promptly al [he hour of Compline, the official appeared. He found Proklos and said that he had an appointment in the bishop’s cell. Already acquainted with this information, Proklos went toward the bishop’s cell to announce the official’s arrival. Having found the door shut, he was thinking there was no one inside the cell. He then peered through the little opening in the door. He observed the bishop sitting and writing. A bald man of venerable aspect, who was over John’s shoulder, was bent over and speaking into his ear. Having seen this, Proklos presumed t:hat the visitor came from abroad to speak with the holy bishop. Proklos tarried for a long while waiting for the man to exit. Seeing that he had not yet come out, Proklos went to t:he court official and said that it was not possible to see the holy man, for a visitor was speaking privately with him. Nonetheless the official wished to wait a little longer, since his need to see Bishop John was great. At length he sent Proklos again to the bishop’s cell. Proklos fell in with his wishes and went again, only to see the same man with the bishop. Proklos returned somewhat piqued, because he could not find t:he opportunity to usher in the court official and because that other man had entered unannounced, without making an appointment with him. Proklos again waited a little longer, and was distressed for the court official. He then went again to have another look. Once more he observed the same man speaking with the bishop. Now he perceived that the bishop was extremely intent on what the visitor was speaking into his ear. Meanwhile time was passing. The signal was already given that it was time for Orthros. The saint then rose up and went into the church. He was neither made aware that the court official came, nor that Proklos observed him with a visitor in his cell.

The following day, the court official came again. His need was extreme to meet with the holy man. Proklos went to inform the bishop that the official came. Again he witnessed that bald man speaking into the bishop’s ear. Saint John appeared engrossed with what he was hearing. Proklos gave his word neither to eat nor close his eyes until he should learn who that man was that entered and what he was seeking. It drew onto the third night. The court official came and enjoined Proklos to speak to the bishop about his case. Proklos said to him, “Be not grieved. Tonight he is alone, for I have kept a close watch and no one else has entered. Thus I shall go and speak to him.” Proklos therefore went again, and-O Thy wondrous works, 0 God!-he beheld the same man speaking with the bishop. He waited again, but that man in no wise came out. He returned to the official and said, “Go and entreat God to help thee in thy need, because, even now as I see, it is not possible to converse with the holy bishop today, nor even tomorrow, until God dispenses otherwise on thy behalf.” Thereupon the court official went to his house saddened on account of his unhappy circumstances.


Morning came, and the saint remembered t:he court official who had been told to return. He asked Proklos about the court official. “Perhaps his matter was corrected?” Proklos answered, “He came, despota (master), and waited three nights here, but he was unable to meet with thee.” The saint said, “And how come thou didst not come and tell me about him, even as I commanded thee?” Proklos replied, “I did come, my despota, five, even ten times, but it was not possible to speak with thee, because a certain reverent looking bald man was standing over thee, speaking into thine ear, and I did not wish to interrupt his conversation, for I observed thou didst give great heed to what he uttered. ” The saint asked, “And who was that person who was speaking?” Proklos answered, “My despota, who that man was I know not. ” Proklos then went on describing the man, when he happened to look at the wall opposite where the bishop had his writing desk. There was an icon of Saint Paul on the wall. Proklos took one glance at the icon and understood immediately that the man he was describing was already depicted in the sacred image, and exclaimed, “The man with whom I saw thee was like unto the Apostle Paul, whom thou hast in the icon before thee when thou dost write.”

Saint John then understood that God hearkened unto his prayer, and that it was God’s will that he should expound upon the Epistles of the Apostle Paul. Saint John then continued writing homilies which are extant today, that is, The Fourteen Epistles of Saint Paul, which are a great treasure for the Church of Christ.

Saint John then attended to the case of the court official, which he pleaded before the emperor. The matter was rectified, and the court official was reinstated to his former honor.

Saint John gave most of his sermons in the Cathedral of the Holy Wisdom, Hagia Sophia. However, he also preached in the basilica of the Holy Apostles, the little Anastasis Church, or at other churches and martyrs’ shrines. A bishop usually preached from his throne at the far end of the apse, well behind the altar. In Saint John’s time the altar was not hidden behind an iconostasion. The holy man preferred to address the people at closer range, seated at the ambo or pUlpit-like lectern where the Epistles were chanted. Socrates says that at that stage in his life the saint’s voice was not strong enough to fill the cathedral. Moreover, he wished to establish closer eye contact with his listeners.

He discouraged clapping and cheering in church. He gave a sermon that they ought to listen to his words to the end, and not clap. “Believe me,” he toldchrysostomos the congregation, “I speak not other than I feel. For why should I not own the truth? When as I discourse I hear myself applauded, at the moment, indeed I feel it as a man; I am delighted, and give way to the pleasurable feeling. But when I get home, and bethink me that those who applauded received no benefit from my discourse, but that whatever benefit they ought to have got, they lost it while applauding and praising, I am in pain, and groan, and weep, and feel as if I had spoken all in vain. I say to myself: ‘What profit comes to me from my labors, while the hearers do not choose to benefit by what they hear from us?’ Nay, often have I thought to make a rule which should prevent all applauding, and persuade you to listen with silence and becoming orderliness. But bear with me, I beseech you, and be persuaded by me, and, if it seem good to you, let us even now establish this rule, that no listener be permitted to applaud in the midst of any person’s discourse, but if he will needs admire, let him admire in silence. There is none to prevent him. And let all his study and eager desire be set upon the receiving the things spoken.-What means that noise again? I am laying down a rule against this very thing, and you have not the forbearance even to hear me!” (Even while Saint John was protesting against this custom, which was derived from the theaters, some of the listeners could not refrain from expressing their approbation by applause.) “Now why did you applaud again? I have just issued a prohibition against that very thing, and you will not obey! From henceforth this rule will hold: that we will listen to the speaker in silence …. But what is this? Are you applauding again? It seems very difficult to break away from the habit. … But again I beg you.”


- from the Life of our Holy Father John Chrysostomos


Categories: Apostle Paul · John Chrysosotom · Orthodox Christianity · St. John Chrysostom

mercy !

October 18, 2009 · Leave a Comment

SECOND SUNDAY OF SAINT LUKE

Apostle Luke

Holy Apostle Luke 6:31-36


Let us all be filled with the love of Christ * and show great compassion * to the evil and to the good. * Yea, let us show mercy * to all, like God our Father, * and we shall be deemed worthy of everlasting life.


Categories: Evangelion · St. Luke the Evangelist

against anger

October 12, 2009 · Leave a Comment

ST BASIL THE GREAT
Homily Against Anger
1 When medical precepts are to the point and accord with the art’s teachings, their usefulness is demonstrated above all from experience; likewise with spiritual injunctions, above all when the precepts receive testimony from their outcome, then they are manifest as wise and useful for the correction of life and the perfection of those who comply with them. For we have heard Proverbs explicitly declare, “Anger destroys even the prudent” [Prov 15.1], and we have also heard the apostolic injunction, “Put away from you all anger and temper and clamor, with all malice” [Eph 4.311, and the Lord's saying that one who is angry without purpose at his brother is subject to judgment IMt 5.22]. Now, when we have come to experience this passion, not arising in ourselves but assaulting us from outside like some unexpected tempest, then above all we discover the excellence of the divine precepts. When we make space for the anger, like an outlet for a violent river, while quietly observing the undignified confusion of those overpowered by the passion, we discover from their actions that these words are to the point: “An angry man is not dignified” [Prov 11.25].
For whenever, once reason has been pushed aside, the passion takes control of the soul for itself, it makes the human being entirely like a wild beast; it does not allow him to be a human being, since he no longer has the help of reason. For as venom is in venomous animals, so temper becomes in those who are provoked. They are maddened like dogs, they strike like scorpions, they bite like snakes. Scripture also acknowledges this in calling those ruled by this passion by the name of wild beasts, to whom they have made themselves skin through evil. For it calls them dumb dogs [Is 56.10], and snakes. a generation of vipers [Mt 23.33], and the like. For those prepared to destroy each other and harm those of their own kind would be appropriately counted among the wild beasts and venomous animals. in whom is present by nature an irreconcilable hatred toward human beings.
Because of anger tongues are unbridled and lips are unguarded; unrestrained hands, outrages, reproaches, slanders, blows, and other such things that cannot be numbered, are offspring of the passions of anger and temper. Through temper also a sword is sharpened; a human hand dares to kill a human being. Through this brothers have become ignorant of each other, and parents and children have forgotten their natural bond. For angry persons are first ignorant of themselves, then indeed of all their friends as well. For as mountain torrents rushing together toward the valleys sweep away whatever is in their path, so the violent and ungovernable attacks of angry people likewise sweep through everything. Those whose temper is aroused respect neither gray hairs, nor virtuous life, nor close kinship, nor favors previously received, nor anything else worthy of honor. Temper is a kind of short-lived insanity. Often they even rush to do manifest harm to themselves in their zeal for revenge, heedless of their own concerns. For as if stung on all sides by a gadfly by the memory of those who have grieved them, as their temper struggles and leaps within them. they do not desist until either they have done some harm to those who have provoked them, or perhaps also received some, as may happen, as often objects that are smashed violently suffer greater damage than they cause when shattered against hard bodies.
2 Who could adequately describe the evil, how those with quick tempers, having fastened on a chance pretext, shouting and furious, attack no less than some shameless venomous beast? Such a person does not stop until great and incurable harm is done, as if a bubble of anger bursts and boiling, seething hot phlegm pours out. For neither a sword’s edge, nor fire, nor anything else frightening, is sufficient to hold back the soul driven insane by anger; any more, perhaps, than they hold back those subject to the demons, from whom angry people differ in nothing, either in the appearance or in the disposition of their soul. For in those who long for revenge, the blood boils around the heart as if stirred up and blustering because of a raging fire. Bursting forth to appear visibly, it shows the angry person with an appearance different from the one customary and familiar to all, as if it were exchanged for some mask on stage. Those near him do not recognize in his eyes their usual expression; but his gaze is frenzied and fire is in his eyes. He sharpens his teeth like a boar going into battle. His face is livid and suffused with blood, his swollen body is heavy, his blood vessels burst. His breathing rushes wildly, driven by the storm within. His voice is harsh and strained to the uttermost, and his speech is inarticulate, pouring forth heedlessly, proceeding without sequence or order or clarity.
But whenever anger becomes implacable, like a flame with abundant fuel, and holds tight to provocations. then indeed the spectacle is indescribable and unbearable to behold. His hands are lifted against his kinsfolk and all the limbs of his body attack, while his feet leap mercilessly upon the most vital organs, and everything at hand becomes a weapon for the madness. And if such persons also find an equal wickedness fighting against them from the opposing side, another anger and a similar insanity, then indeed they come to blows. They then inflict on each other and themselves suffer such things as perchance those under the command of such a demon are to suffer. For maiming of limbs or even death are often the prizes of anger that those fighting carry away. One started to do violence unjustly and the other repaid it; the second inflicted harm in return, the first did not submit. And the body is cut asunder by blows, while the temper removes the perception of pain. For they do not have time for the perception of what they have suffered, since the whole of their soul has been moved toward revenge against those who have grieved them.
3 Do not then cure the evil with evil, nor attempt to outdo each other in such matters. For in contests for superiority in wickedness the victor is more miserable, since he departs having the greater sin. Therefore, do not become one who pays an evil debt in full, nor take out a wicked loan by greater wickedness. Has someone insulted you in anger? Stop the evil by silence. But you, as if receiving the stream of that person’s anger into your own heart, imitate the wind, repaying by blowing back what it has borne to you. Do not use your enemy as a teacher, and as for what you hate, do not emulate this. Do not, as it were, become a mirror of the one prone to anger, showing the likeness of that person in yourself. He has turned red. But are you not the color of wine? His eyes are bloodshot. But, tell me, do yours look calm? His voice is harsh. Is yours gende? The echo in the desert does not shout back as clearly to one who speaks loudly as the insults turn back against the abuser. Rather, the echo comes back the same while the abuse returns with something added. For what sorts of things do insulters say to each other? One says the other is an insignificant person born of an insignificant person; the other in return calls him a slave born of a slave in the household. One says “poor laborer:’ the other says “tramp:’ One says “stupid:’ the other says “crazy:’ until their insults, like arrows, run out. Then, when all the abuse of the tongue has been hurled, then in addition they proceed to avenge themselves through actions. For temper incites fighting, and fighting gives birth to abuse, and abuse to blows, and blows to wounds, and often wounds to death.
From the very beginning let us stop the evil, removing the anger from our souls by every contrivance. For thus we could excise the greatest number of evils together with this passion, since it is a kind of root and source. Has someone abused you? Bless him. Has he struck you? Endure it. Does he spit on you and regard you as nothing? Then accept this thought about yourself, that you were taken from the earth, and you will return to the earth again [Gen 3.19]. For one who applies this concept to himself beforehand, will find all dishonor to be less than the truth. For thus indeed you will provide your enemy no means of revenge, you will show yourself invulnerable to the abuse, and you will procure for yourself a great crown of perseverance, making the other’s insanity a starting point for your own philosophy. So, if you listen to me, you will even add freely to the insults. Does he say you are insignificant, and lower class, and a nobody from nowhere? Then say you are yourself earth and ashes. You are not more majestic than our father Abraham, who called himself these things [Gen 18.27]. Does he call you stupid and a beggar and worthy of nothing? Then say that you are yourself a “worm” [Ps 22.6], and born from a dunghill, as David’s words say. To these examples add also the goodness of Moses. When abused by Aaron and Miriam, he did not accuse them before God but prayed for them [Num 12.1ff]. Would you not choose to be a disciple of such men, who are friends of God and blessed, rather than of those filled with the spirit of wickedness?
When you are stirred by the temptation to abuse, consider that you are being tested as to whether through long-suffering you will come near to God, or through anger run away toward the adversary. Give your thoughts the opportunity to choose the good portion. For you will either help that person somehow through your example of meekness, or exact a more severe vengeance through disdain. For what could become more painful to your enemy, than to see his enemy as above insults? Do not overturn your own purpose, and do not appear to be easily accessible to those who insult you. Let him bark at you ineffectually; let it burst upon himself. For the one who strikes one who feels no pain takes vengeance on himself, for neither is his enemy repaid, nor is his temper assuaged. Likewise, the person reproaching one unaffected by abuse is unable to find relief for his passion. On the contrary, as I have said, he is indeed cut to the heart. Moreover, in these circumstances, what sorts of things will each of you be called? He is abusive, but you are magnanimous; he is prone to anger and hard to bear, but you are long-suffering and meek. He will change his mind about the things he said, but you will never repent of your virtue.
4 Why must I say so many things? The abuse shuts him out of the kingdom of heaven, “for abusers will not inherit the kingdom of God” [1 Cor 6.10]; but your silence prepares the kingdom, “for he who perseveres until the end, that one will be saved” [Mt 10.22]. But when you take revenge and oppose the abuse by equaling it, what will you say in your defense? Is it enough that he provoked you? And does that make you worthy of pardon? For the fornicator who transfers the blame to his girlfriend, as having greatly enticed him toward the sin, is no less worthy of condemnation. There are neither crowns without opponents, nor defeats without adversaries. Listen to David, who says, “When the sinner stood against me;’ not “I was provoked;’ or “I took revenge;’ but “I was mute and humbled, and I kept silence from good things” [Ps 38.2-3, LXX]. But you are provoked by the abuse since you consider it rude, bad, crass; yet you imitate it as good. For behold, you have the same passion that you condemn. Are you anxious to look down on another’s evil? Or do you regard your own disgraceful conduct as nothing? Are insults wicked? Flee from imitating them. For indeed the fact that another started it does not suffice to excuse you. Therefore, it is more just, as I myself am persuaded, even if his irritation is greater, since he did not have an example of self-control; but you, seeing the ugliness of the angry person, did not guard yourself against taking on his likeness, but are irritated and annoyed and angry in return; and your passion becomes an excuse for the one who started it. For by the things you do yourself, you release him from guilt, and you condemn yourself. For if temper is wicked, why did you not turn away from the evil? But if it is worthy of pardon, why are you annoyed at the bad-tempered person? So, if you came second to the angry exchange, this is no advantage to you. For in wrestling matches, it is not the one who moves first in a bout but the one who wins that is crowned. Accordingly, not only one who initiates something terrible, but also one who follows a wicked leader toward sin, is condemned.
Suppose he calls you a poor laborer. If he speaks truly, admit the truth; but if he lies, what are his words to you? Neither be filled with conceit about praise that goes beyond the truth, nor be aggravated over insults that do not apply to you. Do you not see how arrows naturally pierce through hard and rigid objects, but their force is blunted by soft and yielding objects? Consider indeed that the power of abuse is of the same kind. One who resists it receives it into himself, while one who yields and withdraws dissolves by his gentleness of character the wickedness brought against him.
But why does the name “poor” trouble you? Remember your own nature, that you came naked into the world and will leave it naked [Job 1.21]. What is more poor than a naked person? You have heard nothing terrible, unless you claim what has been said as your own. Was anyone ever carried off to prison because of poverty? It is not shameful to be poor, but it is shameful not to bear the poverty nobly. Remember the Master, who “being rich, became poor for our sake” [2 Cor 8.9]. If you are called foolish and stupid, recall the Judean insults through which the true Wisdom was abased: “You are a Samaritan, and you have a demon” Dn 8.48]. So if you act angry, you have confirmed the reproaches; for what is more foolish than anger? If you remain without anger, you shame the one insulting you, showing self-control through your actions.
Have you been struck? So also was the Lord. Have you been spat upon? So also was our Master. For, “he did not turn away his face from the shame of spitting” [Is 50.6]. Were you falsely accused? So also was the Judge. Did they tear off your garment? They also stripped my Lord and divided his clothes among themselves [Mt 27.31, 35]. You have not yet been condemned, you have not yet been crucified. Many things are lacking to you, if you would overtake him through imitation.
5 Let each of these things enter into your mind, and let them hold back the flames. For by preparing and predisposing ourselves beforehand through such reflections, we stop the leaping and throbbing of our heart and bring back our thoughts to steadiness and calm. This also, then, is what was said by David, that “I am prepared and am not troubled” [Ps 119.60]. Accordingly, it is necessary to hold back the frantic and passion-stricken movement of the soul by remembering the examples of blessed men: how meekly the great David bore the raving violence of Shimei For he did not give opportunity to the movement of anger, but redirecting his thought toward God, he said, “The Lord told Shimei to curse David” [2 Sam 16.10J. Therefore, upon hearing himself called a man of blood, a lawless man, he did not become aggravated by this but humbled himself, accepting the insults as if he deserved them. Strip away from yourself these two attitudes: neither consider yourself worthy of great things, nor regard another human being as greatly inferior to you in worth. For then our temper will never rise up against the dishonors that are brought upon us.
It is terrible for one who has benefited from good deeds and is indebted for great favors to be ungrateful and besides this to begin inflicting insults and dishonors. It is terrible, but more for the one doing it than for the one who suffers the evil. Let him insult you, but do not yourself inflict insults. Let what is said be an athletic school to train you in philosophy. If you have not been bitten, you are not wounded. But if indeed you suffer something in your soul, keep what causes pain within yourself. For the Psalmist says, "My heart is troubled within me" IPs 143-47], that is, he did not let the passion pass to the outside but calmed it, as a wave is broken on the beach. Quiet for me your howling and raging heart. Let your passions respect the presence of reason in you, like a disorderly child at the coming of a respected man.
How, then, can we flee the damage caused by anger? We can persuade temper not to act before thought, but let us first take care that it never runs ahead of reason; let us keep it like a horse under a yoke, and let it obey reason as if it were a kind of bridle, never stepping outside its own place, but being led by reason wherever it guides it. Further, the soul’s faculty of temper is useful to us in many of the acts of virtue. When like a soldier who has placed his arms in the custody of his commander, it readily offers help in what is ordered, it can perhaps be an ally to reason against sin. For the temper is a sinew of the soul, producing vigor in it for the accomplishment of good actions. When the soul is relaxed through pleasure, as when iron is hardened by tempering, this faculty leads it from being soft and slack to become austere and courageous. If your temper is not roused against the Evil One, you will not be able to hate him as much as he deserves. For I hold that it is necessary to have equal zeal for the love of virtue and for the hatred of sin. For this above all temper is useful. Whenever like a dog beside a shepherd it follows the rational faculty closely, it remains meek and tame toward those helping it, and readily available at the call of reason, while it is savage toward the strange voice and face, even if he seems to provide a service, but bows down when called by a companion or friend. The cooperation of the faculty of temper with the prudent part of the soul is most excellent and appropriate. For such a person will be irreconcilable and implacable toward things plotted against him, never accepting fondness toward what is harmful, but like a wolf ever howling and tearing to pieces the proposed pleasure. Such indeed is the usefulness of temper for those who know how to handle it.
For by the way it is used each of the other faculties also becomes either evil or good for the one who possesses it. As for the soul’s faculty of desire, one who uses it for the enjoyment of the flesh and the consumption of impure pleasure is disgusting and licentious, while one who turns it toward the love of God and the longing for eternal good things is enviable and blessed. And again, as for the rational faculty, one who handles it well is prudent and intelligent, while one who sharpens his mind for the harm of his neighbor is a worker of mischief and evil.
6 Therefore, let us not make the faculties given us for salvation by the Creator into starting points of sin for ourselves. So also, indeed, the temper, moved when it is necessary and as it is necessary, produces courage and perseverance and self-restraint; but when acting against right reason it becomes insanity. For this reason also the Psalm advises, “Be angry, but do not sin” IPs 4.5]· And the Lord threatens judgment for those who are angered without purpose IMt 5.22], but he does not reject the use of anger for things that are necessary, as a medicine. For the words, “I will place enmity between you and the serpent” [Gen 3.15], and “Be enemies of the Midianites” [Num 2P7], teach us to use temper as a weapon. For this reason Moses, the meekest of all people [Num 12.3], when punishing idolatry, placed weapons in the hands of the Levites for the slaughter of their brothers. He said, “Let each put his sword on his thigh, and go through from gate to gate, and return through the encampment; and let each kill his brother, and each his neighbor, and each the one near him” [Ex 32.27]. And a little later he says, “You have consecrated your hands today to the Lord, each in his son, and in his brother, that a blessing may be given to you” [Ex 32.29, LXX]. And what made Phineas just? Was it not his just anger against the fornicators? He, being very kind and gentle, when he saw that the fornication of Zambri and the Midianite woman had become open and shameless, and they did not hide the unseemly sight of their shame, did not hold back but used his temper for a needful purpose, driving his javelin through them both [Num 25.6--8]. And did not Samuel, when Agag the king of Amalek was kept alive by Saul contrary to the command of God, in just anger lead him forward and slaughter him 11 Sam 15·33J? SO, often temper becomes a helper in good acts. And Elijah the zealot killed four hundred and fifty men, priests of shame, and four hundred men, priests of the groves, who ate at Jezebel’s table, through considered and prudent temper, for the benefit of all Israel [1Kgs 18.22-401·
But you are angry at your brother without purpose. For how is it not without purpose when one acts because the other provokes him? And you act like dogs who bite the stones when they cannot reach the one throwing them. The one acted upon is to be given compassion, the one acting is to be hated. Redirect your temper onto the murderer of human beings, the father of lies, the worker of sin; but sympathize also with your brother, because if he continues in sin, with the devil he will be delivered up to eternal fire.
Yet as temper and anger are different words, so also their meanings differ greatly from each other. For temper is a certain kind of heating and quick rising in steam of passion; but anger is an abiding sorrow and lasting impulse toward vengeance against the wrongdoers, as if the soul lusts for requital. Therefore it is necessary to know that human beings offend through both dispositions, either moved insanely and capriciously by provocations, or deceitfully and treacherously lying in wait for those who grieved them. We must guard against both these errors.
7 How, then, can the passion avoid being directed toward what it must avoid? How? It can if you are taught beforehand the humility which the Lord both prescribed in word and modeled in action, at one time saying, "Let the one who wishes to be first among you be last of all" [cf. Mt 9.35]. and at another time, meek and unmoved, bearing with the one who struck him [Jn 18.22-23]· For the Maker and Master of heaven and earth, who is worshiped by all the intelligible and sense-perceptible creation, who “upholds all things by the word of his power” [Heb 1.8], did not send him alive into Hades. with the earth cleft beneath the impious one. Rather, he admonished and taught, “If I have spoken evilly, bear witness regarding the evil; but if I have spoken well, why do you strike me?” Un 18.23] For if you have become accustomed to being last of all in accord with the commandment of the Lord, when will you be irritated at having your dignity affronted? When a small child abuses you, the insults are an occasion for laughter; and when one driven out of his mind by inflammation of the brain speaks words of disdain, you think him worthy of compassion rather than hatred. Thus the movement of grief is engendered not by the insulting words but by our arrogance toward the one who has abused us and the fantasy each one of us has about himself. So if you put aside from your mind both of these, the noise of the words hurled at you will appear instead as an empty echo. Therefore, “Cease from anger, and leave behind temper” [Ps 37.8], that you may escape the judgment against anger, which “is revealed from heaven upon all the impiety and injustice of human beings” [Rom 1.18]. For if by prudent thought you could cut out the bitter root of temper, you would remove with it many of the passions that begin from this source. For deceit and suspicion and faithlessness and malice and treachery and rashness, and the whole swarm of such wickednesses, are offshoots of this evil. Therefore, indeed, let us not bring to ourselves so great an evil. It is sickness of soul, darkening of thoughts, estrangement from God, ignorance of kinship, cause of conflict, fullness of misfortunes, a wicked demon coming to birth in our very souls. It is indeed as if a certain shameless inhabitant has taken possession beforehand of our inner self and closed the entrance to the Holy Spirit. For where enmity, strife, temper, quarreling, contentiousness and never-silent clamor are produced in the soul, there the Spirit of meekness does not rest. But let us listen to the advice of the blessed Paul and put away from us all anger and temper and clamor with all malice [Eph 4.31], and become kind and compassionate to each other, awaiting the blessed hope promised to the meek. For “blessed are the meek, for they will inherit the earth” [Mt 5.5], in Christ Jesus our Lord, to whom be glory and dominion unto the ages. Amen.

ST BASIL THE GREAT

Homily Against Anger

1 When medical precepts are to the point and accord with the art’s teachings, their usefulness is demonstrated above all from experience; likewise with spiritual injunctions, above all when the precepts receive testimony from their outcome, then they are manifest as wise and useful for the correction of life and the perfection of those who comply with them. For we have heard Proverbs explicitly declare, “Anger destroys even the prudent” [Prov 15.1], and we have also heard the apostolic injunction, “Put away from you all anger and temper and clamor, with all malice” [Eph 4.311, and the Lord's saying that one who is angry without purpose at his brother is subject to judgment [Mt 5.22]. Now, when we have come to experience this passion, not arising in ourselves but assaulting us from outside like some unexpected tempest, then above all we discover the excellence of the divine precepts. When we make space for the anger, like an outlet for a violent river, while quietly observing the undignified confusion of those overpowered by the passion, we discover from their actions that these words are to the point: “An angry man is not dignified” [Prov 11.25].

For whenever, once reason has been pushed aside, the passion takes control of the soul for itself, it makes the human being entirely like a wild beast; it does not allow him to be a human being, since he no longer has the help of reason. For as venom is in venomous animals, so temper becomes in those who are provoked. They are maddened like dogs, they strike like scorpions, they bite like snakes. Scripture also acknowledges this in calling those ruled by this passion by the name of wild beasts, to whom they have made themselves skin through evil. For it calls them dumb dogs [Is 56.10], and snakes. a generation of vipers [Mt 23.33], and the like. For those prepared to destroy each other and harm those of their own kind would be appropriately counted among the wild beasts and venomous animals. in whom is present by nature an irreconcilable hatred toward human beings.

Because of anger tongues are unbridled and lips are unguarded; unrestrained hands, outrages, reproaches, slanders, blows, and other such things that cannot be numbered, are offspring of the passions of anger and temper. Through temper also a sword is sharpened; a human hand dares to kill a human being. Through this brothers have become ignorant of each other, and parents and children have forgotten their natural bond. For angry persons are first ignorant of themselves, then indeed of all their friends as well. For as mountain torrents rushing together toward the valleys sweep away whatever is in their path, so the violent and ungovernable attacks of angry people likewise sweep through everything. Those whose temper is aroused respect neither gray hairs, nor virtuous life, nor close kinship, nor favors previously received, nor anything else worthy of honor. Temper is a kind of short-lived insanity. Often they even rush to do manifest harm to themselves in their zeal for revenge, heedless of their own concerns. For as if stung on all sides by a gadfly by the memory of those who have grieved them, as their temper struggles and leaps within them. they do not desist until either they have done some harm to those who have provoked them, or perhaps also received some, as may happen, as often objects that are smashed violently suffer greater damage than they cause when shattered against hard bodies.

2 Who could adequately describe the evil, how those with quick tempers, having fastened on a chance pretext, shouting and furious, attack no less than some shameless venomous beast? Such a person does not stop until great and incurable harm is done, as if a bubble of anger bursts and boiling, seething hot phlegm pours out. For neither a sword’s edge, nor fire, nor anything else frightening, is sufficient to hold back the soul driven insane by anger; any more, perhaps, than they hold back those subject to the demons, from whom angry people differ in nothing, either in the appearance or in the disposition of their soul. For in those who long for revenge, the blood boils around the heart as if stirred up and blustering because of a raging fire. Bursting forth to appear visibly, it shows the angry person with an appearance different from the one customary and familiar to all, as if it were exchanged for some mask on stage. Those near him do not recognize in his eyes their usual expression; but his gaze is frenzied and fire is in his eyes. He sharpens his teeth like a boar going into battle. His face is livid and suffused with blood, his swollen body is heavy, his blood vessels burst. His breathing rushes wildly, driven by the storm within. His voice is harsh and strained to the uttermost, and his speech is inarticulate, pouring forth heedlessly, proceeding without sequence or order or clarity.

But whenever anger becomes implacable, like a flame with abundant fuel, and holds tight to provocations. then indeed the spectacle is indescribable and unbearable to behold. His hands are lifted against his kinsfolk and all the limbs of his body attack, while his feet leap mercilessly upon the most vital organs, and everything at hand becomes a weapon for the madness. And if such persons also find an equal wickedness fighting against them from the opposing side, another anger and a similar insanity, then indeed they come to blows. They then inflict on each other and themselves suffer such things as perchance those under the command of such a demon are to suffer. For maiming of limbs or even death are often the prizes of anger that those fighting carry away. One started to do violence unjustly and the other repaid it; the second inflicted harm in return, the first did not submit. And the body is cut asunder by blows, while the temper removes the perception of pain. For they do not have time for the perception of what they have suffered, since the whole of their soul has been moved toward revenge against those who have grieved them.

3 Do not then cure the evil with evil, nor attempt to outdo each other in such matters. For in contests for superiority in wickedness the victor is more miserable, since he departs having the greater sin. Therefore, do not become one who pays an evil debt in full, nor take out a wicked loan by greater wickedness. Has someone insulted you in anger? Stop the evil by silence. But you, as if receiving the stream of that person’s anger into your own heart, imitate the wind, repaying by blowing back what it has borne to you. Do not use your enemy as a teacher, and as for what you hate, do not emulate this. Do not, as it were, become a mirror of the one prone to anger, showing the likeness of that person in yourself. He has turned red. But are you not the color of wine? His eyes are bloodshot. But, tell me, do yours look calm? His voice is harsh. Is yours gende? The echo in the desert does not shout back as clearly to one who speaks loudly as the insults turn back against the abuser. Rather, the echo comes back the same while the abuse returns with something added. For what sorts of things do insulters say to each other? One says the other is an insignificant person born of an insignificant person; the other in return calls him a slave born of a slave in the household. One says “poor laborer:’ the other says “tramp:’ One says “stupid:’ the other says “crazy:’ until their insults, like arrows, run out. Then, when all the abuse of the tongue has been hurled, then in addition they proceed to avenge themselves through actions. For temper incites fighting, and fighting gives birth to abuse, and abuse to blows, and blows to wounds, and often wounds to death.

From the very beginning let us stop the evil, removing the anger from our souls by every contrivance. For thus we could excise the greatest number of evils together with this passion, since it is a kind of root and source. Has someone abused you? Bless him. Has he struck you? Endure it. Does he spit on you and regard you as nothing? Then accept this thought about yourself, that you were taken from the earth, and you will return to the earth again [Gen 3.19]. For one who applies this concept to himself beforehand, will find all dishonor to be less than the truth. For thus indeed you will provide your enemy no means of revenge, you will show yourself invulnerable to the abuse, and you will procure for yourself a great crown of perseverance, making the other’s insanity a starting point for your own philosophy. So, if you listen to me, you will even add freely to the insults. Does he say you are insignificant, and lower class, and a nobody from nowhere? Then say you are yourself earth and ashes. You are not more majestic than our father Abraham, who called himself these things [Gen 18.27]. Does he call you stupid and a beggar and worthy of nothing? Then say that you are yourself a “worm” [Ps 22.6], and born from a dunghill, as David’s words say. To these examples add also the goodness of Moses. When abused by Aaron and Miriam, he did not accuse them before God but prayed for them [Num 12.1ff]. Would you not choose to be a disciple of such men, who are friends of God and blessed, rather than of those filled with the spirit of wickedness?

When you are stirred by the temptation to abuse, consider that you are being tested as to whether through long-suffering you will come near to God, or through anger run away toward the adversary. Give your thoughts the opportunity to choose the good portion. For you will either help that person somehow through your example of meekness, or exact a more severe vengeance through disdain. For what could become more painful to your enemy, than to see his enemy as above insults? Do not overturn your own purpose, and do not appear to be easily accessible to those who insult you. Let him bark at you ineffectually; let it burst upon himself. For the one who strikes one who feels no pain takes vengeance on himself, for neither is his enemy repaid, nor is his temper assuaged. Likewise, the person reproaching one unaffected by abuse is unable to find relief for his passion. On the contrary, as I have said, he is indeed cut to the heart. Moreover, in these circumstances, what sorts of things will each of you be called? He is abusive, but you are magnanimous; he is prone to anger and hard to bear, but you are long-suffering and meek. He will change his mind about the things he said, but you will never repent of your virtue.

4 Why must I say so many things? The abuse shuts him out of the kingdom of heaven, “for abusers will not inherit the kingdom of God” [1 Cor 6.10]; but your silence prepares the kingdom, “for he who perseveres until the end, that one will be saved” [Mt 10.22]. But when you take revenge and oppose the abuse by equaling it, what will you say in your defense? Is it enough that he provoked you? And does that make you worthy of pardon? For the fornicator who transfers the blame to his girlfriend, as having greatly enticed him toward the sin, is no less worthy of condemnation. There are neither crowns without opponents, nor defeats without adversaries. Listen to David, who says, “When the sinner stood against me;’ not “I was provoked;’ or “I took revenge;’ but “I was mute and humbled, and I kept silence from good things” [Ps 38.2-3, LXX]. But you are provoked by the abuse since you consider it rude, bad, crass; yet you imitate it as good. For behold, you have the same passion that you condemn. Are you anxious to look down on another’s evil? Or do you regard your own disgraceful conduct as nothing? Are insults wicked? Flee from imitating them. For indeed the fact that another started it does not suffice to excuse you. Therefore, it is more just, as I myself am persuaded, even if his irritation is greater, since he did not have an example of self-control; but you, seeing the ugliness of the angry person, did not guard yourself against taking on his likeness, but are irritated and annoyed and angry in return; and your passion becomes an excuse for the one who started it. For by the things you do yourself, you release him from guilt, and you condemn yourself. For if temper is wicked, why did you not turn away from the evil? But if it is worthy of pardon, why are you annoyed at the bad-tempered person? So, if you came second to the angry exchange, this is no advantage to you. For in wrestling matches, it is not the one who moves first in a bout but the one who wins that is crowned. Accordingly, not only one who initiates something terrible, but also one who follows a wicked leader toward sin, is condemned.

Suppose he calls you a poor laborer. If he speaks truly, admit the truth; but if he lies, what are his words to you? Neither be filled with conceit about praise that goes beyond the truth, nor be aggravated over insults that do not apply to you. Do you not see how arrows naturally pierce through hard and rigid objects, but their force is blunted by soft and yielding objects? Consider indeed that the power of abuse is of the same kind. One who resists it receives it into himself, while one who yields and withdraws dissolves by his gentleness of character the wickedness brought against him.

But why does the name “poor” trouble you? Remember your own nature, that you came naked into the world and will leave it naked [Job 1.21]. What is more poor than a naked person? You have heard nothing terrible, unless you claim what has been said as your own. Was anyone ever carried off to prison because of poverty? It is not shameful to be poor, but it is shameful not to bear the poverty nobly. Remember the Master, who “being rich, became poor for our sake” [2 Cor 8.9]. If you are called foolish and stupid, recall the Judean insults through which the true Wisdom was abased: “You are a Samaritan, and you have a demon” Dn 8.48]. So if you act angry, you have confirmed the reproaches; for what is more foolish than anger? If you remain without anger, you shame the one insulting you, showing self-control through your actions.

Have you been struck? So also was the Lord. Have you been spat upon? So also was our Master. For, “he did not turn away his face from the shame of spitting” [Is 50.6]. Were you falsely accused? So also was the Judge. Did they tear off your garment? They also stripped my Lord and divided his clothes among themselves [Mt 27.31, 35]. You have not yet been condemned, you have not yet been crucified. Many things are lacking to you, if you would overtake him through imitation.

5 Let each of these things enter into your mind, and let them hold back the flames. For by preparing and predisposing ourselves beforehand through such reflections, we stop the leaping and throbbing of our heart and bring back our thoughts to steadiness and calm. This also, then, is what was said by David, that “I am prepared and am not troubled” [Ps 119.60]. Accordingly, it is necessary to hold back the frantic and passion-stricken movement of the soul by remembering the examples of blessed men: how meekly the great David bore the raving violence of Shimei For he did not give opportunity to the movement of anger, but redirecting his thought toward God, he said, “The Lord told Shimei to curse David” [2 Sam 16.10J. Therefore, upon hearing himself called a man of blood, a lawless man, he did not become aggravated by this but humbled himself, accepting the insults as if he deserved them. Strip away from yourself these two attitudes: neither consider yourself worthy of great things, nor regard another human being as greatly inferior to you in worth. For then our temper will never rise up against the dishonors that are brought upon us.

It is terrible for one who has benefited from good deeds and is indebted for great favors to be ungrateful and besides this to begin inflicting insults and dishonors. It is terrible, but more for the one doing it than for the one who suffers the evil. Let him insult you, but do not yourself inflict insults. Let what is said be an athletic school to train you in philosophy. If you have not been bitten, you are not wounded. But if indeed you suffer something in your soul, keep what causes pain within yourself. For the Psalmist says, "My heart is troubled within me" IPs 143-47], that is, he did not let the passion pass to the outside but calmed it, as a wave is broken on the beach. Quiet for me your howling and raging heart. Let your passions respect the presence of reason in you, like a disorderly child at the coming of a respected man.

How, then, can we flee the damage caused by anger? We can persuade temper not to act before thought, but let us first take care that it never runs ahead of reason; let us keep it like a horse under a yoke, and let it obey reason as if it were a kind of bridle, never stepping outside its own place, but being led by reason wherever it guides it. Further, the soul’s faculty of temper is useful to us in many of the acts of virtue. When like a soldier who has placed his arms in the custody of his commander, it readily offers help in what is ordered, it can perhaps be an ally to reason against sin. For the temper is a sinew of the soul, producing vigor in it for the accomplishment of good actions. When the soul is relaxed through pleasure, as when iron is hardened by tempering, this faculty leads it from being soft and slack to become austere and courageous. If your temper is not roused against the Evil One, you will not be able to hate him as much as he deserves. For I hold that it is necessary to have equal zeal for the love of virtue and for the hatred of sin. For this above all temper is useful. Whenever like a dog beside a shepherd it follows the rational faculty closely, it remains meek and tame toward those helping it, and readily available at the call of reason, while it is savage toward the strange voice and face, even if he seems to provide a service, but bows down when called by a companion or friend. The cooperation of the faculty of temper with the prudent part of the soul is most excellent and appropriate. For such a person will be irreconcilable and implacable toward things plotted against him, never accepting fondness toward what is harmful, but like a wolf ever howling and tearing to pieces the proposed pleasure. Such indeed is the usefulness of temper for those who know how to handle it.

For by the way it is used each of the other faculties also becomes either evil or good for the one who possesses it. As for the soul’s faculty of desire, one who uses it for the enjoyment of the flesh and the consumption of impure pleasure is disgusting and licentious, while one who turns it toward the love of God and the longing for eternal good things is enviable and blessed. And again, as for the rational faculty, one who handles it well is prudent and intelligent, while one who sharpens his mind for the harm of his neighbor is a worker of mischief and evil.

6 Therefore, let us not make the faculties given us for salvation by the Creator into starting points of sin for ourselves. So also, indeed, the temper, moved when it is necessary and as it is necessary, produces courage and perseverance and self-restraint; but when acting against right reason it becomes insanity. For this reason also the Psalm advises, “Be angry, but do not sin” IPs 4.5]· And the Lord threatens judgment for those who are angered without purpose IMt 5.22], but he does not reject the use of anger for things that are necessary, as a medicine. For the words, “I will place enmity between you and the serpent” [Gen 3.15], and “Be enemies of the Midianites” [Num 2P7], teach us to use temper as a weapon. For this reason Moses, the meekest of all people [Num 12.3], when punishing idolatry, placed weapons in the hands of the Levites for the slaughter of their brothers. He said, “Let each put his sword on his thigh, and go through from gate to gate, and return through the encampment; and let each kill his brother, and each his neighbor, and each the one near him” [Ex 32.27]. And a little later he says, “You have consecrated your hands today to the Lord, each in his son, and in his brother, that a blessing may be given to you” [Ex 32.29, LXX]. And what made Phineas just? Was it not his just anger against the fornicators? He, being very kind and gentle, when he saw that the fornication of Zambri and the Midianite woman had become open and shameless, and they did not hide the unseemly sight of their shame, did not hold back but used his temper for a needful purpose, driving his javelin through them both [Num 25.6--8]. And did not Samuel, when Agag the king of Amalek was kept alive by Saul contrary to the command of God, in just anger lead him forward and slaughter him [1 Sam 15·33]? SO, often temper becomes a helper in good acts. And Elijah the zealot killed four hundred and fifty men, priests of shame, and four hundred men, priests of the groves, who ate at Jezebel’s table, through considered and prudent temper, for the benefit of all Israel [1Kgs 18.22-401·

But you are angry at your brother without purpose. For how is it not without purpose when one acts because the other provokes him? And you act like dogs who bite the stones when they cannot reach the one throwing them. The one acted upon is to be given compassion, the one acting is to be hated. Redirect your temper onto the murderer of human beings, the father of lies, the worker of sin; but sympathize also with your brother, because if he continues in sin, with the devil he will be delivered up to eternal fire.

Yet as temper and anger are different words, so also their meanings differ greatly from each other. For temper is a certain kind of heating and quick rising in steam of passion; but anger is an abiding sorrow and lasting impulse toward vengeance against the wrongdoers, as if the soul lusts for requital. Therefore it is necessary to know that human beings offend through both dispositions, either moved insanely and capriciously by provocations, or deceitfully and treacherously lying in wait for those who grieved them. We must guard against both these errors.

7 How, then, can the passion avoid being directed toward what it must avoid? How? It can if you are taught beforehand the humility which the Lord both prescribed in word and modeled in action, at one time saying, "Let the one who wishes to be first among you be last of all" [cf. Mt 9.35]. and at another time, meek and unmoved, bearing with the one who struck him [Jn 18.22-23]· For the Maker and Master of heaven and earth, who is worshiped by all the intelligible and sense-perceptible creation, who “upholds all things by the word of his power” [Heb 1.8], did not send him alive into Hades. with the earth cleft beneath the impious one. Rather, he admonished and taught, “If I have spoken evilly, bear witness regarding the evil; but if I have spoken well, why do you strike me?” Un 18.23] For if you have become accustomed to being last of all in accord with the commandment of the Lord, when will you be irritated at having your dignity affronted? When a small child abuses you, the insults are an occasion for laughter; and when one driven out of his mind by inflammation of the brain speaks words of disdain, you think him worthy of compassion rather than hatred. Thus the movement of grief is engendered not by the insulting words but by our arrogance toward the one who has abused us and the fantasy each one of us has about himself. So if you put aside from your mind both of these, the noise of the words hurled at you will appear instead as an empty echo. Therefore, “Cease from anger, and leave behind temper” [Ps 37.8], that you may escape the judgment against anger, which “is revealed from heaven upon all the impiety and injustice of human beings” [Rom 1.18]. For if by prudent thought you could cut out the bitter root of temper, you would remove with it many of the passions that begin from this source. For deceit and suspicion and faithlessness and malice and treachery and rashness, and the whole swarm of such wickednesses, are offshoots of this evil. Therefore, indeed, let us not bring to ourselves so great an evil. It is sickness of soul, darkening of thoughts, estrangement from God, ignorance of kinship, cause of conflict, fullness of misfortunes, a wicked demon coming to birth in our very souls. It is indeed as if a certain shameless inhabitant has taken possession beforehand of our inner self and closed the entrance to the Holy Spirit. For where enmity, strife, temper, quarreling, contentiousness and never-silent clamor are produced in the soul, there the Spirit of meekness does not rest. But let us listen to the advice of the blessed Paul and put away from us all anger and temper and clamor with all malice [Eph 4.31], and become kind and compassionate to each other, awaiting the blessed hope promised to the meek. For “blessed are the meek, for they will inherit the earth” [Mt 5.5], in Christ Jesus our Lord, to whom be glory and dominion unto the ages. Amen.

Categories: Anger · Basil the Great · Passions

Unity of the Church

October 11, 2009 · Leave a Comment

The Unity of the Church and the World Conference of Christian Communities

Saint Hilarion (Troitsky)

This is the first audio book offered by the Orthodox Christian Information Center.

Categories: Ecumenism · Saint Hilarion (Troitsky)